May 142015

Hazelburn Rundlets & Kilderkins 10 y.o.052

50.1% abv

Score:  86/100


This is one of the beefiest Hazelburns you’re likely to encounter.  Not just because of the cask strength presentation (actually only about 4% higher than most other standard Hazelburn editions), but because there is something raw and back-to-the-earth about it.  This is tradition, harnessed and yoked and being willfully pulled along in the new age (against the protestations of the groaning old Victorian machinery that provides the heartbeat of this brilliant distillery).  Such is the lifeblood of the Springbank distillery where Hazelburn is produced, and such is the true allure for the whisky aficionado.

To be honest, as a brand Hazelburn is far less exciting to me than the other lines running off the stills at Springbank, but that’s not to say the quality is in any way subpar.  The distillery simply produces a style of malt that is very amenable to the influence of peat, and when that element is no longer a part of the equation it somehow seems to sum up to less than a whole. This is, I concede, a personal bias based on relative experience.

The ‘rundlets’ and ‘kilderkins’ from which this age-stated malt takes its name are small, lesser known barrel sizes historically used in the maturation of ales, wines and whiskies.  To put it in a contemporary context, this is a similar enterprise to what Laphroaig does with their Quarter Casking.  The use of smaller barrels equates to greater wood spirit/wood interplay, which results in accelerated maturation.  Makes sense.  And to give credit where credit is due…with a novel marketing angle such as this at their disposal it’s a credit to Springbank that they maintained an age statement when I think many of their contemporaries would have launched this as an NAS expression.

Nose:  Very naked.  Dusty grains.  Vanilla.  Earthy notes and rye bread.  Some very farmy notes that remind of being near a grain mill.  Still a faint touch of peat, irrespective of the ‘non-peated’ angle.  Probably simply cask leeching from barrels previously used for Springbank or Longrow distillate.  Dark chocolate.  Some nice gentle spices.

Palate:  Spicy, peppery arrival.  Bolder than expected, to be honest (in a good way!).  The grains and wood are very much at the fore here.  And very clean, I should add.  Some leather.  Again…slightly earthy.  Maybe a touch of anise.  Grape skins.

Thoughts:  Clean, nice and flawless, but sort of…well…tough to get excited about this one.  My mind immediately hearkens to what this could have been as a Springbank or Longrow.  Unfair of me, I know, but true.  A nice variation on a theme, even though I think I still prefer the 12 year old.


– Reviewed by:  Curt

– Photo:  Curt

 Posted by at 10:31 am

  4 Responses to “Hazelburn Rundlets & Kilderkins 10 y.o. Review”

  1. This Rundlets & Kilderkins trio are a neat experiment and I agree that it is unexpectedly great to see age statements on them. Since your mind hearkens to the Springbank or Longrow alternatives, you must be glad all three exist! Is the Springbank version in the queue for review? I haven’t tried any yet but did manage to land all three, so one day when the open bottle count gets a bit lower I will have a go at them.

    • I never did manage to get my hands on the SB R&K. If I can get my hands on a sample via swap or from a friend I will definitely write it up.

      • I know someone with a full bottle of the Springbank R&K – he went online as soon as he saw Ralfy’s review and bought a bottle. Wish he’s got one for me too. Maybe we can set something up..

  2. Tried this tonight. Second time I’ve tasted it. I agree with a lot of your notes. I think I prefer Springbank 12 CS.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>