Feb 052013

Bushmills 16 y.o.099

40% abv

Score:  88.5/100


Ahhh…young love.  Sixteen year old bourbon-casked whisky meets sixteen year old sherry-casked whisky.  The two go for a quick roll in a port-infused cask and what we end up with is a sweet, sweet thing.

Surprisingly, something in this one rings incredibly close to exotic depths of fruit.  Not something I’d expect in a dram this young, but I am certainly not complaining.

Nose:  Playdough.  Chewy sugar cookies.  Deep grape notes.  Orange peelings.  Cinnamon and nutmeg.  Dust.  Like a glass of fruit juice.  Mulled cider and maybe a little Amaretto.  At once clean and…not.  In a good way.

Palate:  Black current.  A hint of smoke.  Big purple grape.  Five Alive (for the spectacularly rich fruit mix).  Some mouth-puckering tannins.

Smooth…until the slightly bitter finsh.  Slightly contrived, but exceptionally enticing and enjoyable.  Love this one.


– Reviewed by:  Curt

– Photo:  Curt

 Posted by at 8:20 pm

  4 Responses to “Bushmills 16 y.o. Review”

  1. I’ve never been in love with port finishes anyway because of the bitterness and the stiff punch, so I found this one a little challenging. I recently tried the Balvenie 21 Port Wood and liked it better overall, but it’s still not my favourite profile.

    • I haven’t tried the Balvenie, but do enjoy the Bushmills 16. Not an every day dram, but a pleasant change on occasion, The port finish I don’t like is the Quinta Jeff, I seem to remember you were going to open a Bowmore 18? What did you think?

      • Hi Robert! I did try the Bowmore 18, from the 12/15/18 mini three-pack. I find whiskies generally more difficult to judge from minis because I think they oxidize differently and/or not as well. In any case, the 18 is an excellent, round, mature scotch. The nose is complex, with a number of toffee/sweet notes, combined with traditional peat/sherry/oak (American and French), and even offset by some petroleum and fruit. The palate’s dominated by dark chocolate with a bitter peat twist. The age really shows in the finish, however, with a huge, long fade curve – one of the few whiskies in which I think the finish steals the show. Very well balanced, with great depth for modest power (much like Highland Park 18), I think this should be waited out (consumed over the course of an hour) after giving it lots of time to settle in a capped glass.

        A 91/100 for both myself and my buddy, the Scotch Guru, and the mini did its job – I’ll buy a big one when a Bowmore slot opens up in the roster, but I’ve got a new Darkest to get through first.


        • I agree with your assessment.
          The nose and finish are really pleasant with peat and dark fruit, but the palate
          is less so. I kept wanting to go back for an occassional treat, though, especially as it improved with oxidation. It’s a bit high priced, so I haven’t replaced
          it yet. Would be great to get as a gift! (Hint to relatives!).

Leave a Reply to Jeff Cancel reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>